Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The treatment of loans to a debtor's former employees can result in unforeseen and unfavorable tax consequences. An unwary trustee or administrator of a plan of reorganization (each a 'Responsible Individual') who employs the wrong approach can expose the estate to unanticipated payroll tax liability. Moreover, if the Responsible Individual fails to reserve sufficient funds for payment of such payroll tax liability, he may be forced to pay such liability out of his own pocket. As a result, it is critical that a Responsible Individual be familiar with the issues, and employ the strategies discussed herein.
The Loan Incentive Package
A Responsible Individual's duties under a plan of reorganization often include collection of loans made by the debtor company to its former employees. Frequently, such loans are made as part of a stock incentive program whereby the company loans the employee funds to purchase the company's stock. The loan purchase approach is often favored by employees over a stock option approach, because assuming the stock increases in value as expected, the employee will pay capital gains tax rather than ordinary income tax on the gain. When an employee exercises stock options, the employee must pay ordinary income tax on the difference between the exercise price and the market price at a rate up to 35%. See Treas. Reg. ” 1.83-3(g), 1.61-15(a) (as amended in 2005); I.R.C. ' 1(a-d) (2006); Rev. Proc. 2005-70, 2005-47 I.R.B. 979. By contrast, if the stock loan purchase approach satisfies certain requirements, and the employee holds the stock for a minimum of 1 year, the employee's profit from the stock is treated as capital gain, which is taxed at a maximum of 15%. See 26 I.R.C. ' 1001(a) (2006). In an effort to minimize the risk arising under the loan purchase approach from a potential decrease in the value of the stock, the employer may agree that some portion of the indebtedness will be non-recourse and secured solely by a lien on the stock.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.