Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A new day is dawning for electronic discovery in corporate environments. Opposing counsels recognize that e-documents stored in proprietary formats or on multiple systems no longer mean that they are inaccessible.
The proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which have been covered extensively in e-Discovery Law & Strategy, expand the rules in regards to e-discovery. Scheduled to go into effect on December 1, unless Congress intervenes to change them, examples of previous types of rulings that the amended rules would broaden include:
As these rulings take effect, corporations will become susceptible to broader e-discovery requests ' and susceptible and subject to more of them. As companies respond to these requests, the companies' executives and counsel will awaken to the difficulties and costs of meeting the requests if they use existing access and search processes.
The Process Problem
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?