Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When Is Equipment Not 'Equipment'? Inventory Leasing or Leasing to Rental Companies
It is not unusual for a finance lessor to discover that its Lessee intends to enter into a contract with a third party whereby the Lessee delivers possession of the leased equipment to that third party. Although many finance lessors may be aware of the practical risks associated with having its leased property/collateral in the hands of a third party, many are unaware of the increased legal risks that result from such a situation. This article addresses some of the key issues. For the sake of clarity, the third party receiving possession and control of the leased equipment will be referred to as a 'Sublessee,' and the agreement between the Lessee and the Sublessee will be referred to as a 'Sublease.' It should be noted that a contract of service pursuant to which the Sublessee receives possession also constitutes a 'Sublease' for purposes of this article.
The key legal distinction between this type of transaction and the standard finance lease is that the leased property is treated under the Uniform Commercial Code ('UCC') as 'Inventory' in the hands of the Lessee. It would have been ordinarily considered 'Equipment' were it not for the Sublease. This classification results from the fact that under '9-102(a)(48) of the UCC as Revised in 2001, goods constitute 'Inventory' if they 'are leased by a person as lessor [or] held by a person for sale or lease or to be furnished under a contract of service [or] are furnished under a contract of service.'
As will be discussed in more detail, the classification of the leased property as 'Inventory' raises perfection issues and also allows a Lessee, in certain circumstances, to provide a Sublessee with greater rights with respect to the equipment than the Lessor originally provided to the Lessee.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?