Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bayer Holds Information Back from FDA
Despite the fact that Bayer Pharmaceuticals representatives participated in a Food and Drug Admin-istration (FDA) public meeting Sept. 21, held to assist the Agency in assessing the safety of Bayer's drug Trasylol' (aprotinin injection), they made no mention of a troubling study Bayer had conducted that found several potential life-threatening problems with the heart surgery medicine. On Sept. 29, the FDA announced, 'FDA was not aware of these new data when it held the Sept. 21, 2006, Advisory Committee meeting on Trasylol safety. FDA is actively evaluating these new data and their implications for appropriate use of the drug.' The new data show that use of Trasylol may increase the chance of death, serious kidney damage, congestive heart failure and strokes. The FDA has advised that, while it conducts its evaluation of both the new and old safety information, physicians should continue using Trasylol where needed but carefully monitor patients for the occurrence of toxicity, particularly in the kidneys, heart, or brain.
After acknowledging that the failure to disclose was 'a mistake,' a release from Bayer stated, 'This data was not shared immediately with the agency because it was preliminary in nature and raised significant questions on the study population, outcomes and methodology. Bayer believes that despite the highly preliminary nature of this data, the information should have been shared with the FDA prior to the Sept. 21 Advisory Committee meeting held to assess the safety and efficacy of Trasylol. This was a mistake on the company's part.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.