Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In September, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, a congressionally created entity dedicated to the study of policy matters pertaining to the public health, issued the results of the study of federal drug safety policy commissioned by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The resulting report, titled 'The Future of Drug Safety, Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public' and published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, has been widely anticipated in light of recent publicity surrounding Vioxx' and other drugs that, subsequent to FDA-approval, proved more dangerous than thought. The authors' goals in carrying out the study included gaining a better understanding of the FDA's current role and the roles of other actors in the process and assessing how changes in these organizations and systems could help promote increased drug safety and better public confidence. The committee's bottom line assessment was that major changes in the way the FDA is organized and funded are needed.
Some Organizational Changes
The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the FDA weighs the risks and benefits of new drugs, but thorough oversight of approved medications is lacking, claims the report. Several changes must be made if this situation is to change. Some of these adjustments include:
One of the main issues of contention between the public and the FDA has been that pharmaceuticals manufacturers are seen as being financially and politically involved with FDA personnel, leading to at least a perception of Agency bias toward promoting drug company interests. To combat this, the committee of the Institute of Medicine recommends that the majority of the members of FDA-related advisory committees be unconnected by any financial involvement with the drug companies whose products are being analyzed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.