Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Among the abuses of the bankruptcy system to be remedied by The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) is that of serial filing. In re Mark, 336 B.R. 260 (Bankr. D. Md. 2006) described a serial filer as: ' ' a person who files time and time again just to daisy-chain automatic stays to the detriment of creditors, but without any real prospect and intent to reorganize.'
To confront this issue, BAPCPA has primarily revised ' 362 of the Bankruptcy Code by significantly amending ' 362(c)(3), and adding a new ' 362(c)(4). Lest there be any doubt that these provisions have this intent, ' 302 of the BAPCPA statute is entitled: 'Curb Abusive Filings.' The very first reported case analyzing these provisions, In re Charles, 332 B.R. 538 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. (2005)), observed:
' ' Congress intended to direct the court to conduct an early triage of refiled cases. Debtors whose cases are doomed to fail should not get the benefit of an extended automatic stay.' As of mid-April 2006, approximately 30 cases had been published interpreting these new provisions, making this area one of the more hotly litigated BAPCPA amendments to the Bankruptcy Code.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.