Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The 75-lawyer law firm of Cantey Hanger, L.L.P. is a full-service law firm with four offices in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Among Cantey Hanger's early clients were pioneer banks, utilities and transportation companies. Those areas still are strongly represented, along with energy service firms, manufacturers, telecommunications companies, insurance companies, hospital and health organizations, municipalities and other governmental entities.
As Cantey Hanger's Executive Director, it is my responsibility to enable the firm to compete on all levels. In the ever-changing world of technology, it is particularly important the firm remain competitive to ensure our clients are receiving the highest level of service. With this in mind, last year we implemented a replacement strategy of our copier fleet, including cost recovery products.
Selection Made Easy
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?