Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman will finally be opening shop in Shanghai.
The firm announced Nov. 1 that after more than a year of waiting, its license to practice law in China was approved by the notoriously fastidious Chinese Ministry of Justice.
'Part of our strategy is to have offices in key financial centers in the world,' said Pillsbury Chairman-elect James Rishwain Jr. 'We have offices in London, Sydney, Tokyo and now Shanghai.'
With the opening of the new location, Pillsbury also announced that it would be closing the Taipei office it acquired as part of its 2005 merger with Shaw Pittman.
The Taipei office, Rishwain said, 'doesn't fit our overall strategy,' but he declined to elaborate.
While Shanghai, Beijing, Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore have become popular locations as many U.S. firms seek to expand their Asia practices, few have offices in Taipei.
'We felt that the best way to maximize our resources and expand our footprint in Asia was to focus on our Tokyo and Shanghai offices, as they are located in two of the world's biggest economies,' said Stephen Huttler, the firm's executive vice chairman.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.