CD: 11/29/2006 How to Increase Revenue $1 Million in 1 Year
How to Increase Revenue $1 Million in 1 YearA Case StudyNovember 29, 200612 p.m. - 2 p.m. EasternWeb Audio ConferenceChuhak & Tecson, a 55-lawyer Chicago law firm, began an intensive program of business development coaching 20 of its income partners in 2005. A year later, the group had brought in $1 million in new revenue, with one partner DOUBLING his fees billed. The firm spent only $24,000, met its goal and showed an ROI of over 4000%.
By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 02, 2006
Chuhak & Tecson, a 55-lawyer Chicago law firm, began an intensive program of business development coaching 20 of its income partners in 2005. A year later, the group had brought in $1 million in new revenue, with one partner DOUBLING his fees billed. The firm spent only $24,000, met its goal and showed an ROI of over 4000%.
This Web Audio Conference will show how a full-service law firm increased its revenues by $1 MILLION in a single year by coaching 20 partners on business development. You will learn the exact steps taken so you can replicate this success.
The knowledge gained from this conference will include:
Increase revenue with a premeditated business development coaching program.
Create a marketing culture at a risk-averse law firm.
Engage lawyers in business development by overcoming their objections and building plans around their strengths, activities they enjoy and people they already know.
Educate lawyers on how to sell without being a “salesman”; by asking questions and listening.
Help attorneys pick targets: #1 current clients (the low-hanging fruit), #2 referral sources (the lawyers' allies), #3 carefully chosen targets that fit the firm's strategy.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
