Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A veteran sales trainer was trying to convince a room full of sales professionals to simply keep an open mind. Glancing at the class and back to the flip chart, he tapped his finger on the hand-written third circle and explained: 'This is where ' you don't know what you don't know!' After explaining the first two circles that represented information that 'you know you know,' and 'you know you don't know,' I had to reflect on this profound concept for a moment. And of course ' he was right! The danger zone is clearly the outer circle where one doesn't even recognize the need for knowledge or information.
In the past, young lawyers learned the art of rainmaking on the heels of mentoring partners, both formally and informally. But times have changed. A more competitive legal market, combined with demanding clients, has caused the mentoring partner to focus on more immediate priorities. With no formal education in how to build a practice, obtain new clients or cross-sell services, most young lawyers are inadequately equipped to succeed in today's challenging legal market. But is sales training really the answer? Aren't most professionals smart enough to figure it out on their own?
Here are three examples in which lawyers 'don't know what they don't know.'
The Pitch
In a business development setting, most lawyers go immediately into pitch mode. Based on little or no information, very smart lawyers attempt to convince a client of their unique ability to handle a certain matter. As a result, the meeting quickly turns into a lecture highlighting the profound credentials of the firm and its lawyers. Sometimes the client isn't even allowed to explain what they're looking for.
Before anything else, you must first understand the client's current situation ' and the business issue(s) at hand. If you don't, whatever you say is a guess. Before you say anything, your doctor will ask relevant questions in order to fully understand your problem. She will take many notes and generally perform a thorough assessment prior to prescribing a course of action. Much like your doctor, your first order of business should be diagnosing the problem, not offering a solution! The more you understand the issue and exactly what the client wants the better.
Business Development Activities
Business development success requires some level of activity. Without any formal training or direction, most lawyers will perform what I like to call 'random acts of business development.' Many will adopt the notion that any type of marketing will potentially bring in new work; thus theorizing that all marketing activities are created equal and produce the same return on investment. To a non-lawyer, say a sales representative, this approach has some merit. With unlimited time to sell, a sales professional can afford to invest time in potentially fruitless areas. A practicing attorney focused on billable hours cannot. In order to maximize the return on investment (your time), lawyers should consider spending most of their business development time focused on:
On the other hand, many will elect to spend their time on other activities with a much lower probability for success, such as:
A laser like focus is required to successfully build a practice.
The Close
Remember the famous closing line, 'the only requirement is to sit through a 60 minute presentation?' The part that should have been revealed was the 'arm twisting' closing tactics employed by the time-share developer. Closing new business can be an extremely uncomfortable conversation for most lawyers; perhaps even more painful for the client that feels 'pressured' to buy. Closing a new matter is relatively uneventful if you've followed a logical sales process. The true 'art' of closing is simply a reasonable line of inquiry regarding the buying process of the client ' in order to advance to the next step. The 'close' merely moves the process forward naturally. Typical questions for the client during the latter part of the sales process include:
Until law schools begin to educate students on business development, or rainmakers begin to mentor and teach the tools of the trade, some form of sales and business development training seems rational. After all, 'you don't know what you don't know!'
A veteran sales trainer was trying to convince a room full of sales professionals to simply keep an open mind. Glancing at the class and back to the flip chart, he tapped his finger on the hand-written third circle and explained: 'This is where ' you don't know what you don't know!' After explaining the first two circles that represented information that 'you know you know,' and 'you know you don't know,' I had to reflect on this profound concept for a moment. And of course ' he was right! The danger zone is clearly the outer circle where one doesn't even recognize the need for knowledge or information.
In the past, young lawyers learned the art of rainmaking on the heels of mentoring partners, both formally and informally. But times have changed. A more competitive legal market, combined with demanding clients, has caused the mentoring partner to focus on more immediate priorities. With no formal education in how to build a practice, obtain new clients or cross-sell services, most young lawyers are inadequately equipped to succeed in today's challenging legal market. But is sales training really the answer? Aren't most professionals smart enough to figure it out on their own?
Here are three examples in which lawyers 'don't know what they don't know.'
The Pitch
In a business development setting, most lawyers go immediately into pitch mode. Based on little or no information, very smart lawyers attempt to convince a client of their unique ability to handle a certain matter. As a result, the meeting quickly turns into a lecture highlighting the profound credentials of the firm and its lawyers. Sometimes the client isn't even allowed to explain what they're looking for.
Before anything else, you must first understand the client's current situation ' and the business issue(s) at hand. If you don't, whatever you say is a guess. Before you say anything, your doctor will ask relevant questions in order to fully understand your problem. She will take many notes and generally perform a thorough assessment prior to prescribing a course of action. Much like your doctor, your first order of business should be diagnosing the problem, not offering a solution! The more you understand the issue and exactly what the client wants the better.
Business Development Activities
Business development success requires some level of activity. Without any formal training or direction, most lawyers will perform what I like to call 'random acts of business development.' Many will adopt the notion that any type of marketing will potentially bring in new work; thus theorizing that all marketing activities are created equal and produce the same return on investment. To a non-lawyer, say a sales representative, this approach has some merit. With unlimited time to sell, a sales professional can afford to invest time in potentially fruitless areas. A practicing attorney focused on billable hours cannot. In order to maximize the return on investment (your time), lawyers should consider spending most of their business development time focused on:
On the other hand, many will elect to spend their time on other activities with a much lower probability for success, such as:
A laser like focus is required to successfully build a practice.
The Close
Remember the famous closing line, 'the only requirement is to sit through a 60 minute presentation?' The part that should have been revealed was the 'arm twisting' closing tactics employed by the time-share developer. Closing new business can be an extremely uncomfortable conversation for most lawyers; perhaps even more painful for the client that feels 'pressured' to buy. Closing a new matter is relatively uneventful if you've followed a logical sales process. The true 'art' of closing is simply a reasonable line of inquiry regarding the buying process of the client ' in order to advance to the next step. The 'close' merely moves the process forward naturally. Typical questions for the client during the latter part of the sales process include:
Until law schools begin to educate students on business development, or rainmakers begin to mentor and teach the tools of the trade, some form of sales and business development training seems rational. After all, 'you don't know what you don't know!'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.