Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
False Endorsement Claims
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction barring the use of the 'Lil' Kim' mark to advertise or promote a DVD documentary of the rap group Junior M.A.F.I.A. Jones v. Ground Zero Entertainment, 05 Civ. 6461(JSR). Prior to her solo career, Lil' Kim (Kimberly Jones) had been a member of Junior M.A.F.I.A. She filed suit after her likeness and 'Lil' Kim' name were used on the documentary's cover and promotional materials. The complaint alleged, among other things: false endorsement and false advertising in violation of Sec. 43(a) of the Lanham Act; deceptive trade practices; unfair competition; misappropriation; and unjust enrichment. The district court explained: 'Although not persuaded that Jones is likely to prevail on certain of her claims, the Court finds that Jones is likely to prevail on her claim that the defendants' use of her trade name, 'Lil' Kim,' constitutes false endorsement in violation of the Lanham Act. Because the 'Lil' Kim' mark appears prominently on certain of the covers of the DVD, as well as some of the promotional material, in a manner that suggests endorsement, 'an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent purchasers are likely to be misled, or indeed simply confused, as to the source of the goods in question' ' Defendants say that the use of 'Lil' Kim' is simply descriptive of one of the prominent persons featured in the documentary. The doctrine of fair use … permits use of a protected mark by others to describe certain aspects of the user's own goods ' but is inapplicable here, as the Court finds (for purposes of preliminary injunctive relief only) that the use here strongly suggests en-dorsement and, in any event, was not in good faith.'
(No Counsel of Record listed in court decision.)
First-Amendment Defense
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.