U.D. Registry, Inc. Topples California Security Freeze Act

In a decision that may have repercussions throughout the United States, a California Court of Appeal has ruled that California's Security Freeze Act violates the First Amendment because it precludes the reporting of information contained in public records. The challenge to the Freeze Act was brought by U.D. Registry, Inc. ('UDR'), a company that maintains information on tens of millions of people in California and elsewhere, providing landlords and property managers with reports about prospective tenants. UDR had challenged California's freeze law, Cal. Civil Code §1785.11.2, as unconstitutional. The appellate court, however, also reversed an injunction that had completely barred the state from enforcing the law, and directed a new injunction be issued barring enforcement against UDR only.

15 minute read November 17, 2006 at 09:21 AM
By
Luis Salazar
U.D. Registry, Inc. Topples California Security Freeze Act

In a decision that may have repercussions throughout the United States, a California Court of Appeal has ruled that California's Security Freeze Act violates the First Amendment because it precludes the reporting of information contained in public records.

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Subscribe Now

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

How Courts Interpret and Apply the Interplay Between the Bankruptcy Code and Medicare Program Act

The combination of increasing operating costs and uncertain government reimbursement funding continues to place health care providers under financial pressure, and in many cases, financial distress. Given the importance of Medicare/Medicaid funding of claims under provider agreements with the federal government, how courts interpret and apply the interplay between the Bankruptcy Code and Medicare Program Act determines the disposition of hundreds of millions of dollars of claims for reimbursement that support the health care system.

April 30, 2026

AI Transparency: Clear Explanations Matter More Than Disclosure

As AI becomes embedded in everyday business and legal operations, organizations are confronting a new expectation: simply disclosing AI use is no longer enough. A critical shift is taking place in the legal industry: transparency is no longer just about disclosure; it’s about comprehension.

April 30, 2026