Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Base Salaries Up; Bonus Levels Mixed

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 28, 2006

The recently released 2006 Altman Weil Law Department Compensation Benchmarking Survey of U.S. corporate law departments, published in partnership with LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, shows base salaries up across the board for in-house lawyers in 2006.

'Corporations have two tools to set in-house cash compensation ' guaranteed base salary and at-risk, performance-based bonus dollars,' notes Altman Weil principal James S. Wilber. 'Each year we see a balancing act between these two components. Last year, salaries rose slightly, augmented by big bonuses. This year, we're seeing bigger salary increases reflecting greater corporate confidence, along with a mixed bag of bonus levels which seem designed to catch up some of the more junior in-house positions that were overlooked in past years.'

'Increased mobility between law firms and law departments forces corporations to compensate more competitively in the war for talent, especially at the senior level,' remarks Barry Solomon, Vice President and General Manager of LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell. 'As a result, corporations will reward their top law department officers first, and only later adjust compensation for junior managers and staff lawyers.'

Base Salaries Rise

Median salaries for all positions in law departments increased between 2.2% and 9.5% in 2006. Chief Legal Officer (CLO) salaries were up 8% and Division General Counsel (mid-level management lawyers) took home 7.1% more. Lawyers in non-management positions also saw increases, with High Level Specialists up 9.5%, Senior Attorneys (non-managers with eight or more years experience) up 8.5% and Staff Attorneys (attorneys with at least one year of experience) reporting an increase of 3.5%. Recent graduates reported a modest 2.2% raise.

All trend comparisons are drawn from a super-group of over 200 law departments that have participated in the survey over sequential years.

The survey reports national median salary for Chief Legal Officers in 2006 at $280,000. The Senior Attorney position drew $140,000, while a new law school graduate earned a starting salary of $65,000.

Bonuses a Mixed Bag

Bonuses were up across the board for non-management positions in law departments ' in some instances dramatically. Senior Attorneys reported bonus increases of 14.4% while more junior Attorneys and Staff Attorneys received bonus increases of 62.5% and 71% respectively. In the management ranks, Division General Counsel bonuses went up 20.29% and Managing Attorneys 25.32%. Chief Legal Officers and their Deputies received bonuses that were down from the prior year.

The national median bonus for Chief Legal Officers was $132,000, according to the Survey. Division General Counsel received $104,000 in bonus dollars, and Senior Attorneys took home a $29,200 bonus.

Stock Options

Stock options for Chief Legal Officers had a median fair market value of $919,400 in 2006, more than twice the same group's' total cash compensation. Deputy CLOs received $230,100 in stock options, Senior Attorneys $87,900 in options, and Staff Attorneys $24,700.

Other Variables

Size of law department is a key factor in the top officer compensation. Chief Legal Officers in departments with over 25 lawyers took home 88.9% more than the national median in total cash compensation. Deputy CLOs in large law departments earned 57.5% more than the national median.

The survey reveals a significant difference in CLO compensation by industry. Median total cash compensation for CLOs in the Information / Telecommunications sector was 75% more that their colleagues in the Service sector and 39.9% more in total cash compensation than their peers nationally.

In non-management positions, prac-tice specialty is also a significant differentiator. High Level Specialists with a Mergers & Acquisitions specialty earn top dollar, 23.8% more than the national median in total cash compensation. For Senior Attorneys and Attorneys (with four-plus years experience), a Patents specialty is the most lucrative, at 22% and 33% above the national norms, respectively.

Survey Methodology

The complete Law Department Compensation Benchmarking Survey, 2006 edition contains data from 277 law departments providing compensation data for 6,255 lawyers. Information on an additional 41 one-lawyer departments is included separately.

The Survey reports data on nine in-house positions: Chief Legal Officer, Deputy Chief Legal Officer, Division General Counsel, Managing Attorney, High Level Specialist, Senior Attorney, Attorney, Staff Attorney and recent law school graduate. Data are analyzed by industry, company size (revenue and employees), law department size, region, metropolitan area, years of experience and other key parameters. Data are reported as of March 1, 2006.

The recently released 2006 Altman Weil Law Department Compensation Benchmarking Survey of U.S. corporate law departments, published in partnership with LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, shows base salaries up across the board for in-house lawyers in 2006.

'Corporations have two tools to set in-house cash compensation ' guaranteed base salary and at-risk, performance-based bonus dollars,' notes Altman Weil principal James S. Wilber. 'Each year we see a balancing act between these two components. Last year, salaries rose slightly, augmented by big bonuses. This year, we're seeing bigger salary increases reflecting greater corporate confidence, along with a mixed bag of bonus levels which seem designed to catch up some of the more junior in-house positions that were overlooked in past years.'

'Increased mobility between law firms and law departments forces corporations to compensate more competitively in the war for talent, especially at the senior level,' remarks Barry Solomon, Vice President and General Manager of LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell. 'As a result, corporations will reward their top law department officers first, and only later adjust compensation for junior managers and staff lawyers.'

Base Salaries Rise

Median salaries for all positions in law departments increased between 2.2% and 9.5% in 2006. Chief Legal Officer (CLO) salaries were up 8% and Division General Counsel (mid-level management lawyers) took home 7.1% more. Lawyers in non-management positions also saw increases, with High Level Specialists up 9.5%, Senior Attorneys (non-managers with eight or more years experience) up 8.5% and Staff Attorneys (attorneys with at least one year of experience) reporting an increase of 3.5%. Recent graduates reported a modest 2.2% raise.

All trend comparisons are drawn from a super-group of over 200 law departments that have participated in the survey over sequential years.

The survey reports national median salary for Chief Legal Officers in 2006 at $280,000. The Senior Attorney position drew $140,000, while a new law school graduate earned a starting salary of $65,000.

Bonuses a Mixed Bag

Bonuses were up across the board for non-management positions in law departments ' in some instances dramatically. Senior Attorneys reported bonus increases of 14.4% while more junior Attorneys and Staff Attorneys received bonus increases of 62.5% and 71% respectively. In the management ranks, Division General Counsel bonuses went up 20.29% and Managing Attorneys 25.32%. Chief Legal Officers and their Deputies received bonuses that were down from the prior year.

The national median bonus for Chief Legal Officers was $132,000, according to the Survey. Division General Counsel received $104,000 in bonus dollars, and Senior Attorneys took home a $29,200 bonus.

Stock Options

Stock options for Chief Legal Officers had a median fair market value of $919,400 in 2006, more than twice the same group's' total cash compensation. Deputy CLOs received $230,100 in stock options, Senior Attorneys $87,900 in options, and Staff Attorneys $24,700.

Other Variables

Size of law department is a key factor in the top officer compensation. Chief Legal Officers in departments with over 25 lawyers took home 88.9% more than the national median in total cash compensation. Deputy CLOs in large law departments earned 57.5% more than the national median.

The survey reveals a significant difference in CLO compensation by industry. Median total cash compensation for CLOs in the Information / Telecommunications sector was 75% more that their colleagues in the Service sector and 39.9% more in total cash compensation than their peers nationally.

In non-management positions, prac-tice specialty is also a significant differentiator. High Level Specialists with a Mergers & Acquisitions specialty earn top dollar, 23.8% more than the national median in total cash compensation. For Senior Attorneys and Attorneys (with four-plus years experience), a Patents specialty is the most lucrative, at 22% and 33% above the national norms, respectively.

Survey Methodology

The complete Law Department Compensation Benchmarking Survey, 2006 edition contains data from 277 law departments providing compensation data for 6,255 lawyers. Information on an additional 41 one-lawyer departments is included separately.

The Survey reports data on nine in-house positions: Chief Legal Officer, Deputy Chief Legal Officer, Division General Counsel, Managing Attorney, High Level Specialist, Senior Attorney, Attorney, Staff Attorney and recent law school graduate. Data are analyzed by industry, company size (revenue and employees), law department size, region, metropolitan area, years of experience and other key parameters. Data are reported as of March 1, 2006.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.