Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
November 29, 2006

Copyright Renewal/'Posthumous Work'

A Manhattan federal district court decided in a complex case that the short-story 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang' wasn't a posthumous work under the Copyright Act, even though the story's British author Ian Fleming died before the work was published. Legislator 1357 Ltd. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (MGM), 04 Civ. 3951(MGC). The late author's nieces sued claiming ownership of the 1993 renewal term in the story and infringement through the defendant's recent distribution of the film 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang,' originally made under a rights assignment in the 1960s. The Copyright Act doesn't define 'posthumous work.' The movie studio argued that the story was one, whose renewal rights therefore vested in the book trust that Fleming set up to grant the TV and film rights that the studio subsequently obtained. But the district court stated: 'In addition to assigning the copyright and entering into contracts during his lifetime [for the story], Ian Fleming revised manuscripts for publication. ' The rights in the renewal term therefore vested in the trustees of the Will Trust as executors of Fleming's estate and not, as defendants contend, in the trustees of the Book Trust.' However, the court ruled, among other things, that MGM could pursue an equitable-estoppel defense due to the 'lengthy delay in filing this [2004] action, as well as defendants' good faith belief that plaintiffs viewed them as the owners of the film rights in the Work.'


Radio Broadcasting/Sponsored Airplay

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee declined to dismiss counterclaims raised by defendants in a suit a Nashville radio station filed seeking payment for sponsored airplay of music. WYCQ Inc. v. National Music Marketing Inc. (NMM), 3:05-0979. Promotion company NMM had agreed to buy time for its clients' music to be played on WYCQ and affiliated stations. WYCQ later filed suit claiming that NMM had failed to pay by a promised date the full amount owed for the 'spins.' The radio station's complaint alleged breach of contract, conversion and fraudulent misrepresentation. Air-time buys are allowed under federal anti-payola laws, which mandate that stations inform listeners of the airplay paid sponsorship. NMM alleged in its counterclaims to WYCQ's suit that some WYCQ practices violated the anti-payola statutes, 47 U.S.C. Secs. 317 and 508. WYCQ responded that NMM lacked standing to pursue the counterclaims because the federal statutes offered no private cause of action. The district court noted: '[E]ven if WYCQ had somehow violated anti-payola statutes in the performance of its contract with NMM, such violation likely would be so ancillary to the underlying contract as to have no impact on it.' But the court added that NMM's 'breach of contract and conversion claims do not stand on statutory violations alone. ' Instead, they appear to be garden-variety allegations that WYCQ (1) breached the parties' contract by improperly conducting contests sponsored by NMM; and (2) converted for its own use money that NMM had allotted for the contests. ' Thus, while WYCQ has properly called into question one of the bases for these claims, it cannot succeed in dismissing them altogether, as they rest on other grounds.'


Royalty Waiver/Copyright Not Transferred

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.