Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CASE CAPTION: Radar Entertainment LLC and Vincent Dymon v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and Telepictures Productions Inc., L.A. Superior Court # BC361954.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of implied contract; breach of confidence; intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; and unfair competition.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: Plain-tiff Dymon created a treatment for a proposed reality TV series called 'Jury Duty.' The premise was that actual small claims court cases would be adjudicated by a jury comprised of celebrities in the entertainment industry. A pilot episode was produced in July 2004, and was pitched to Telepictures in Aug. 2004. A Telepictures representative said that Telepictures wasn't interested. About a year-and-a-half later, Telepictures and Warner began development of a series using the idea but didn't compensate or contact the plaintiff.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.