Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Looking Outside the Firm for On-Point Work Product

By Justin Hectus
November 29, 2006
The value of a good lawyer is not proven in redrafting maps of familiar ports, but rather it is secured by successfully navigating uncharted waters. Sophisticated purchasers of legal services understand this, and they expect today's lawyers to quickly locate, validate, update and utilize past work product where it is prudent to do so. Forward thinking firms now utilize tools to effectively mine their own documents, but I was recently introduced to an amazing concept: Why stop looking for precedent documents at your firewall, if you can just as easily access documents filed by your competitor? The ramifications of this new concept are astounding.

Looking Inside the Firm

Responding to various client demands (faster turnaround and lower costs among them) and a mandate to improve internal realization rate, many firms have begun to seek ways to make better use of their existing stores of documents. These initiatives are broadly lumped under the term 'knowledge management.' Not long ago, knowledge management was the domain of a few attorneys who understood the value of maintaining precedent or form files. (See, Knowledge Management and Portal Technologies.) It saw its broadest (and perhaps most aggravating) incarnation in firm-wide e-mails, in which an individual attorney might request information on a given topic from his or her peers.

The last few years have seen firms intensify their efforts to formulate broader strategies for tapping existing work product on an institutional level. Various vendors have responded with applications that take differing approaches to solving the problem, ranging from universal search to targeted work product retrieval. However the given system works, the overriding objective is the same: to find the right work product at the right time.

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.