Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Any equipment leasing or finance company desiring to access the debt capital markets must quickly become adept at dealing with a unique feature of that world: the credit rating and its gatekeeper, the credit rating agency. Entering this realm can be a jolt for finance officers used to the relationship-friendly, competitive environment of commercial banks. Dominated by two monoliths, Standard & Poor's and Moody's, the rating agency process is steeped in the clinical analytics of credit modeling. Rating agencies are viewed by many as academic in perspective and, to some, remote and obscure in their approach.
Some of this may soon begin to change. On Sept. 29, 2006, President Bush signed into law the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006 (Public Law No. 109-291, at http://thomas.loc.gov/). This Act is the first legislation to regulate credit rating agencies and states its purpose as 'to improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry.'
The Act results from long and extensive debate regarding: 1) the role of the credit rating agencies in the securities markets, and 2) the degree of governmental involvement needed to protect investors who rely on such credit ratings. Many see the Act, which grants the SEC the power to oversee and regulate credit rating agencies, as the final reform in the spirit of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ('SOX'). (It is not surprising that Representative Michael G. Oxley introduced the original House version of the legislation.)
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?