Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When an attorney is creating work product, a document assembly product is in order. It's the perfect tool to bring together needed information that is otherwise often stored in incongruent systems such as document management systems, other documents and Internet resource sites. Attorneys and legal staff need to leverage a firm's library of past work, while eliminating the frustrating tasks of endless cutting and pasting and hunting for source documents.
However, without a document assembly application, the law firm's clients are paying billable attorney hours to search for the information they need. This noticeable lack of productivity and waste of resources can be avoided through the utilization of a content rich document assembly application. Nonetheless, many firms still struggle with automating document assembly, based on some common content and content system-related issues:
Key Elements to a Document Assembly Application
An Enterprise Based Document Assembly Application (EDA) starts with the best parts of a firm's current method of assembling documents. EDA leverages a firm's library of past work, while eliminating the frustrating tasks of endless cutting and pasting and hunting for source documents. Establish and follow these specific EDA rules for content reuse:
Acquiring an Expert System Knowledge Base
How the firm captures the expert knowledge in the EDA is very important. The expert knowledge base lays in the minds of attorneys, stored documents and workflow processes that possess much of the content by default. Acquiring this knowledge from all these disparate sources and placing it into the working models of the EDA should be straightforward and dynamic:
Return on Investment
When your EDA is based on a centralized content store and Microsoft Office, the firm is able to increase its return on investment (ROI). ROI is more than the money invested in the technology and the resources deployed. ROI should consist of long-term user training investment, productivity gains because of the EDA and mitigated migration costs when upgrading to new technologies. The gains a firm will typically have when deploying an effective EDA are:
Conclusion
Firms that adopt Enterprise Based Document Assembly Applications can save money and increase attorney productivity immediately and in various practice settings ' whether in private or government practice, or even an in-house legal department. An effective EDA essentially provides the biggest firm benefit when its knowledge management features are used to share knowledge among larger practice groups. One attorney can take advantage of the experience, expertise and content created by another. With the built-in transaction knowledge content it represents, an EDA is essentially a practice guide online, with the ability to create documents that adhere to a firm's best practices in one place.
When an attorney is creating work product, a document assembly product is in order. It's the perfect tool to bring together needed information that is otherwise often stored in incongruent systems such as document management systems, other documents and Internet resource sites. Attorneys and legal staff need to leverage a firm's library of past work, while eliminating the frustrating tasks of endless cutting and pasting and hunting for source documents.
However, without a document assembly application, the law firm's clients are paying billable attorney hours to search for the information they need. This noticeable lack of productivity and waste of resources can be avoided through the utilization of a content rich document assembly application. Nonetheless, many firms still struggle with automating document assembly, based on some common content and content system-related issues:
Key Elements to a Document Assembly Application
An Enterprise Based Document Assembly Application (EDA) starts with the best parts of a firm's current method of assembling documents. EDA leverages a firm's library of past work, while eliminating the frustrating tasks of endless cutting and pasting and hunting for source documents. Establish and follow these specific EDA rules for content reuse:
Acquiring an Expert System Knowledge Base
How the firm captures the expert knowledge in the EDA is very important. The expert knowledge base lays in the minds of attorneys, stored documents and workflow processes that possess much of the content by default. Acquiring this knowledge from all these disparate sources and placing it into the working models of the EDA should be straightforward and dynamic:
Return on Investment
When your EDA is based on a centralized content store and
Conclusion
Firms that adopt Enterprise Based Document Assembly Applications can save money and increase attorney productivity immediately and in various practice settings ' whether in private or government practice, or even an in-house legal department. An effective EDA essentially provides the biggest firm benefit when its knowledge management features are used to share knowledge among larger practice groups. One attorney can take advantage of the experience, expertise and content created by another. With the built-in transaction knowledge content it represents, an EDA is essentially a practice guide online, with the ability to create documents that adhere to a firm's best practices in one place.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.