Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At top-rated firms, lawyer development and training has become the cornerstone of successful recruiting programs for both law school and lateral recruiting efforts. This trend assures that firms with active development programs will continue making significant investments in their attorney and potential attorney's futures via their professional development programming. Law firms whose professional development programs have recently evolved as the logical offspring of identified recruiting and retention needs and demands are actively engaged in the process of showcasing their professional development programs to their much sought-after recruits.
Law firms 'expend enormous resources recruiting law students and lateral attorneys for summer and full-time positions.' See, Vanessa L. Johnson, Paradigm Shift: Applying Human Resource Management Theory to the Large Law Firm Recruiting and Selection Process, 10 (2006). Lower than expected success rates and declining retention rates are frustrating after the tremendous time and money spent on recruiting efforts, and have resulted in some firms' re-evaluation of how to address the needs of its prospects and new attorneys. During the recruiting 'courtships,' most firms have witnessed a paradigm shift: Law students are no longer shy about telling law firms what they need and expect upon joining their privileged ranks, or about asking firms what the firm will do to ensure the professional success of its new hires. This paradigm shift is one of the most forceful factors behind the birth of the formalized Attorney Professional Development Program. The recruits' demand for more structured professional development, mentoring and other integration programming has been a strong catalyst for implementation of such programs in the law firm setting. Many firms have responded by developing, and then showcasing, their professional development programs throughout their entire recruiting process.
It's no revelation that many law firms are losing the retention battle and have been in 'catch-up' mode to execute programs to successfully retain their valued attorneys. The statistics are disheartening; studies show that '40 percent of entry-level hires today will depart their firms within three years of being hired ' 62 percent will move on after four years and 78 percent will be gone within five years of being hired.' See, Minority Corporate Counsel Association, The Myth of the Meritocracy: A Report on the Bridges and Barriers to Success in Large Law Firms, 19 (2003).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?