Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Justice Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, a Manhattan Supreme Court judge, issued a decision in late December, Gonzalez v. Green, '- N.Y.S.2d ”, 2006 WL 3849128 (N.Y.Sup.), (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty. 12/28/06) (Gangel-Jacob, J.), which held that divorce could not be granted to a same-sex couple married in Massachusetts. Despite this, the court found enforceable a separation agreement signed by both parties in anticipation of divorce. The court's reasoning can be taken as cautionary advice to same-sex partners and their attorneys ' particularly the monied partner and his or her legal representative.
The Parties
Plaintiff David Gonzalez and defendant Steven Green had been in a same-sex domestic partner relationship since 2001. Green invited Gonzalez, who was a university student at the time, to move in with him. As a student, Gonzalez had no income of his own, but Green gave him many expensive gifts, including two cars and a ski house in Gonzalez's name.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.