Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FDA Takes X-Ray Manufacturer to Task
GE OEC Medical Systems Inc. in January signed a consent decree of permanent injunction prohibiting it from manufacturing or distributing X-ray machines from its Salt Lake City and Lawrence, MA, facilities. The X-ray systems previously manufactured at these locations were used during diagnostic, surgical, and interventional procedures, such as orthopedic, cardiac, critical-care and emergency room procedures.
The FDA issued its initial Warning Letter to the company in March 2005 following an inspection that revealed violations of the FDA's current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements as set forth in the Quality System (QS) regulation for devices. When a second inspection in 2006 showed the previously-reported problems continued ' including failure to establish and maintain adequate procedures for validating the device design and failure to establish and maintain adequate procedures for implementing corrective and preventive actions ' the FDA imposed this more stringent enforcement action. The decree will require GE OEC Medical Systems to hire an independent expert to conduct inspections of the affected facilities and to certify to the FDA that corrections have been made before manufacturing and distribution may resume.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?