Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Exchange-Traded Solvency Derivatives

By Todd L. Padnos and Brett J. Kitel
March 26, 2007

In the last ten years, the credit derivatives market has grown from its infancy to approximately $26 trillion of notional value according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ('ISDA'). The most highly utilized type of credit derivative, the credit default swap, is used by investors to bet on a company's creditworthiness or hedge a position in a fashion that protects against the company's failure to make a payment or satisfy other terms.

To date, credit default swaps have been issued only in private transactions and traded solely in the over-the-counter market ('OTC') by large, sophisticated investors. Thus, while the proliferation of credit default swaps has had an impact upon distressed companies, the lack of a standardized, exchange-traded credit default swap has limited the scope and magnitude of this impact.

Recently, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ('CME') obtained approval from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ('CFTC') to offer the first ever standardized, exchange-traded, centrally cleared and guaranteed product available to the credit derivatives market. These instruments, called credit event contracts ('CECs'), are intended to provide a transparent and liquid means of acquiring protection against the filing of a bankruptcy case by or against a single company (the 'Reference Entity'). Trading through a central counterparty such as the CME should remove many of the risks, difficulties and expenses associated with trading credit default swaps. Thus, the availability of CECs is likely to foster further expansion of the credit derivatives market and will undoubtedly have a significant impact upon future corporate restructurings.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.