Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This month marks the beginning of a new feature in which Patent Strategy & Management expands its coverage to provide information about the advancement of lawyers in the patent profession. If you have news that you would like to submit to this column, please send it via e-mail to [email protected] with a 'Patent Movers and Shakers' subject line.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, a national law firm with offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Miami, has announced that Brian M. Rothery has joined the firm's Intellectual Property Practice Group as a partner.
'Brian is an important addition to our firm. In addition to his broad IP experience he will add considerable depth to our medical device and consumer products practice,' said Steven Pokotilow, co-chair of Stroock's Intellectual Property Practice Group.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?