Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Overpleaded Opposition Supports DJ Motion

By Jane Shay Wald
March 27, 2007

Can a Notice of Opposition in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ('PTO') Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ('TTAB') give rise to an actual controversy under the Declaratory Judgment Act to support a trademark Applicant's federal declaratory judgment ('DJ') action against the Opposer? Generally, it can't ' or more accurately, it doesn't. But in Neilmed Products, Inc. v. Med-Systems, Inc., No. C 06-00964 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2007), the Northern District of California found that the Notice of Opposition pleaded detailed factors relevant to liability for trademark infringement and dilution. This enthusiastic overpleading did far more than state a claim as to why the applicant's mark should not be allowed to register, which is the TTAB's sole jurisdiction. It gave Applicant a reasonable basis to believe Opposer would sue it for infringement, thereby providing the jurisdictional basis for a DJ action.

The Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. '2201 permits a federal court to 'declare the rights and other legal relations' of parties to 'a case of actual controversy.' An actual controversy has been viewed as requiring the DJ plaintiff to have a reasonable apprehension that it will be subject to liability.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.