Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Trade Dress Limits On Copyright Licenses

By Patrick Eyers
March 27, 2007
Amidst the pantheon of pop culture icons, Marilyn Monroe retains a unique allure. And so it is that the first federal case to consider directly the intersection of copyright and trade dress rights arose from a dispute over the use of revealing photographs of a young Monroe on labels of red wine. The case, Nova Wines, Inc. d/b/a/ Marilyn Wines v. Adler Fels Winery LLC, No. C 06-06149 (N.D.Cal Dec. 1, 2006), out of the Northern District of California, was decided on a preliminary injunction motion and involved two commercial wine merchants intent on capitalizing on Monroe's enduring marketability. Judge Marilyn Hall Patel held that Nova Wines could assert its established trade dress rights in the use of photographs of Monroe on wine labels to prevent the holder of a valid copyright license in certain nude photographs of the actress from using one such image in a similar fashion. In reaching its decision, the court explored the evolving interplay between the copyright, trademark, and trade dress regimes.

Factual Background

Plaintiff Nova, doing business as Marilyn Wines, had produced wines under variations of the Marilyn Monroe brand name and with labels bearing the image of Monroe for 20 years. In 1989, Nova obtained from the Monroe estate an exclusive license to use the registered trademark 'Marilyn Monroe,' as well as the common law marks for Monroe's name, image, and likeness, in selling its wines. In 1999, Nova was approached by Tom Kelley Studios, Inc. ('TKS'), the copyright holder in a series of 1949 nude photographs of Monroe taken when the actress was an unknown 23-year-old, referred to as the 'Red Velvet Collection.' In 2004, the parties entered a licensing agreement for the use of the Red Velvet Collection photos, a relationship that deteriorated in mid-2005. TKS's September 2005 revocation of Nova's license to the Red Velvet Collection photographs remains a subject of arbitration. After terminating its arrangement with Nova, TKS promptly entered into negotiations with other wineries for use of the images on wine labels. In the summer of 2006, Nova learned that Adler Fels was planning to release a wine bearing a Red Velvet Collection image. In July 2006, Adler Fels refused to 'succumb to [Nova's] threats' and began marketing the wine in September, at which time Nova proceeded to file suit.

The Court's Decision

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?