Viacom v. YouTube

It is likely that the type of issues Justice Story had in mind will be at the center of the lawsuit Viacom, and related entities ('Viacom'), initiated against YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC and Google Inc. ('YouTube') on March 13, 2007. In February of this year, Viacom provided YouTube with 'take down notices' for removal of all of its copyright protected content after the two parties failed to reach a distribution agreement following months of negotiation. The suit that followed alleges, among other things, that 'YouTube has harnessed technology to willfully infringe copyrights on a huge scale, depriving writers, composers and performers of the rewards that are owed for effort and innovation, reducing the incentives of America's creative industries, and profiting from the illegal conduct of others as well.' Moreover, the suit states that 'YouTube's brazen disregard of the intellectual property laws fundamentally threatens not just Plaintiffs but the economic underpinnings of one of the most important sectors of the United States economy.' Viacom alleges that it has identified more than 150,000 copies of infringing materials posted on YouTube which have collectively been viewed over 1.5 billion times. Google Inc., recent YouTube acquirer, has not historically been a stranger to claims that it engages in copyright infringement by the likes of its Google Web Search, Google News, Google Video, Google Image Search and Google Book Search projects, and it appears that its YouTube acquisition has engendered more of the same comments about its cavalier attitude toward others' intellectual property rights.

The concept of legal protection for intellectual property can be traced back to Ireland in the sixth century. At that time a renegade bishop, who would later become St. Columba, snuck into a library and copied, by hand, a psalter (which is essentially a book containing various psalms) and thereafter provided copies for free to various local churches. This incensed the owner of the library and he filed a claim against St. Columba in King Diarmait's royal court. This was very interesting since there was no reference to the library's owner being the author of the psalter, merely the owner of the book. Regardless, the King decreed 'To every cow its calf, to every book its copy,' and fined St. Columba 40 head of cattle for making an unauthorized copy. St. Columba rallied his kinsmen and went to war against King Diarmait over the decision. This event, referred to as the 'Battle of the Books', led to King Diarmait's defeat in 560 or 561. While fining an infringer 40 head of cattle is nowhere to be seen in the current federal statutory copyright damages, the concept of going to war to vigorously protect a rights-holder continues to persevere in our court system even to this day.