Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Counsel Concerns
Sanctions/Failure to Identify Documents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a sanction against lawyers for a defamation plaintiff for failure to comply, in good faith, with a court order to identify documents that would be relied on at trial. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 05-3004. Little League baseball coach Robert Muzikowski had sued over the depiction of a coach in the film 'Hardball,' based on a non-fiction book about inner-city Little League teams with which Muzikowski had been involved. The appeals court found for the defendants on the ground that the depiction could be seen as innocent or defamatory. Also, the district court had adopted a magistrate's sanctions of $50,915 on Muzikowski's counsel ' Schuyler, Roche & Zwirner (SRZ) of Chicago ' for the 'reasonable expenses' to the Paramount defendants of sorting through 14,599 pages of documents from SRZ 'for possible use at trial.'
Assessing the amount of the sanction, the appeals court noted: 'Although SRZ contests reasonableness of the hours expended by Paramount's lawyers reviewing the documents Muzikowski produced, the magistrate judge characterized Paramount's figures as a low-ball estimate, explaining that the figure was 'reasonable especially in light of the fact that its attorneys realistically reviewed thousands of pages of documents far in excess of the 14,599 figure [on which the magistrate based the sanctions].' Nor are we convinced by SRZ's contention that the district court erred by basing its sanctions calculation on the hourly rate Paramount's lawyers charged defendants, rather than requiring Paramount to prove 'that the rates claimed are market rates' ' As far as we can tell, SRZ has never come forth with any evidence to show that the rates charged by Paramount's lawyers are not market rates. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion by accepting these rates as reasonable.'
***
Sanctions/Misleading Declaration. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California sanctioned counsel for Beach Boy Mike Love in Love's suit over use of a Beach Boys photo on the cover of a CD retrospective of Beach Boy Brian Wilson's career that was distributed by a UK newspaper. Love v. The Mail on Sunday, CV 05 7798 ABC PJWX. Love had sued for unfair-competition under the federal Lanham Act, but the district court ruled that the Lanham Act didn't apply because it was 'undisputed that the allegedly infringing acts occurred overseas.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?