Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Limiting the Effect of BAPCA

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 27, 2007

I once knew a senior executive of a debtor client who was well known within our bankruptcy practice for wanting nothing more from his/her company's Chapter 11 case than court approval of the company's key employee retention program. That is not to say that this particular executive was in any way unique. To the contrary, he/she was merely illustrative of the running joke among many bankruptcy practitioners that the first question asked by an executive of any new Chapter 11 debtor is, 'Have the petitions been filed?' And the second question is, 'Who's negotiating the executive bonus program?'

Lurking behind the smile of every attorney who laughed at that joke, however, lies a very real concern: namely, that retaining key employees and talented executives through the course of a Chapter 11 case is no easy task. Working for a Chapter 11 debtor provides an executive with substantial career uncertainty. In exchange for such uncertainty, the executive is asked to take on substantially increased responsibility, deal with angry creditors and equity holders, and respond daily (if not hourly) to attorneys and financial advisers for any number of often unfriendly constituents ranging from the official committee of unsecured creditors to the Office of the United States Trustee (the 'UST'). In order to pacify fearful and overworked executives and to incentivize qualified executives to remain employed by Chapter 11 debtors, creative professionals and Chapter 11 executives developed what has become known as a key employee retention program, or KERP. These programs provide bonuses to executives and other key employees if they remain employed by the debtors through a date certain (often consummation of a plan of reorganization or similar benchmark). Additionally, these programs often offer severance payments to employees who are expected to be terminated without cause during the course of a Chapter 11 liquidation. Until the adoption of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ('BAPCA'), KERPs were widely and successfully utilized by Chapter 11 debtors to ensure that top talent did not leave for greener, more certain, and usually less demanding pastures.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.