Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
All New York title insurance policy and endorsements forms as well as the premium rates must be filed with and be approved by the New York Department of Insurance. Title underwriters almost always file with the Department through the Title Insurance Rate Service Association ('TIRSA'), a state sanctioned rating bureau comprised of the great majority of title underwriters licensed to do business in New York. In developing new forms, TIRSA, in turn, receives guidance from the American Land Title Association ('ALTA'), an organization whose membership includes title companies from across the nation. The title insurance policy forms currently in use in New York are based upon those promulgated by ALTA in 1992. However, because the ALTA forms are national, TIRSA often suggests modifications to the forms to account for New York's laws and local practices. Upon approval by the Insurance Department, these modifications are implemented through the provisions of the TIRSA Rate Manual, which sets forth premium rates, coverage limitations or expansions from the national policy, as well as the rules and guidelines governing title underwrites. The coverage expansions or limitations are then carried over to the New York Endorsement to the title policy which is attached to every policy and specifically modifies the terms of the policy to account for rules and regulations set forth in the Rate Manual. There are two basic title policy forms: 1) the owner's or fee policy, which insures the owners of the insured premises; and 2) the mortgage or loan policy, which insures the lender whose loan is secured by a mortgage on the owner's property. Each policy has its own New York Endorsement.
Revised Forms
After three years of meetings and discussions not only with title companies, but also with other players in the real property industry such as lenders, realtors and government regulators, ALTA revised the 1992 forms in 2006. On Nov. 8, 2006, TIRSA filed with the Insurance Department for approval to issue the 2006 ALTA forms in New York. On March 5, 2007, the Insurance Department approved the issuance of the new 2006 forms in New York, effective May 1, 2007. The 2006
forms contain many changes from the 1992 forms with which New York real estate practitioners have grown very much acquainted. Most of the changes are rather technical and most real estate attorneys will not encounter them in their day-to-day operations. (When was the last time someone requested a Last Dollar Endorsement from you?) However, there are five (5) significant changes of which real estate practitioners should be aware:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?