Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
No Duty to Protect Against Arsonist
There is no duty to protect third parties from uninvited intruders. Travelers Property Casualty v. Vernadette Pratt et al., No. 41,387-CW, Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit, Sept. 27, 2006.
Pratt and the Costanzas entered into an oral lease for space where Pratt operated a restaurant. The restaurant shared a common wall with the adjacent store, a men's clothing store owned by Miletello. An arsonist started a fire in the restaurant, causing extensive damage to both the restaurant and the clothing store. Both Miletello and the Costanzas were insured by Travelers Property Casualty Company under separate policies. Travelers paid its insured's losses and filed a subrogation action against Pratt and her insurer, claiming the sole and proximate cause of the fire was Pratt's negligence in failing to secure the premises adequately.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.