Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We here at Law Journal Newsletters pride ourselves on providing the best-possible, most useful content for our readers. We do this by keeping in constant contact with our Boards of Editors, almost all of whom are attorneys who are experts in their various fields. We talk to readers who call and e-mail. We devour other legal publications (since ALM is our parent company, we have access to the best legal dailies and magazines in the business).And yet, we rarely hear from YOU, our readers and subscribers.Every now and then, we send out a Reader Survey and ask you what you want us to cover, what you want to read in our pages, what you find helpful'and not helpful. Only a handful of you respond. Given my own tendency to delete or throw away such surveys, I'm not surprised. We are all too busy, all buried under a single day's deadlines, not to mention the ones for tomorrow, next week, next month. Attending a child's Little League game or school play becomes a challenge worthy of a congressional hearing. So who wants to fill out a survey? I get it'the problem is, we haven't GOT it.So consider this Blog an open invitation from Law Journal Newsletters to you. Let's start a dialog. We really DO want to know if you don't like something in one of our newsletters. We really DO want to know what you want more of, or less of, in our pages. We want to know if we are missing something. We want to know if we are overdoing something. Should we cover more or less pharmaceutical news in Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy? Do we have too much or too little Valuation information in The Matrimonial Strategist? Is Internet Law & Strategy filling your needs, or should we get more technical? Should there be more charts in Accounting and Financial Planning for Law firms, or less?Are we helping you keep your eye on all the trends in your practice areas? That's what we are here to do, and despite the fact that we have renowned experts writing and serving on our Boards, that does not mean we have provided everything you need, something we can only judge if we hear from you.So we invited your comments. Write early and often. We promise an answer, and we promise to listen. Don't be a stranger! E-mail: [email protected].
We here at Law Journal Newsletters pride ourselves on providing the best-possible, most useful content for our readers. We do this by keeping in constant contact with our Boards of Editors, almost all of whom are attorneys who are experts in their various fields. We talk to readers who call and e-mail. We devour other legal publications (since ALM is our parent company, we have access to the best legal dailies and magazines in the business).And yet, we rarely hear from YOU, our readers and subscribers.Every now and then, we send out a Reader Survey and ask you what you want us to cover, what you want to read in our pages, what you find helpful'and not helpful. Only a handful of you respond. Given my own tendency to delete or throw away such surveys, I'm not surprised. We are all too busy, all buried under a single day's deadlines, not to mention the ones for tomorrow, next week, next month. Attending a child's Little League game or school play becomes a challenge worthy of a congressional hearing. So who wants to fill out a survey? I get it'the problem is, we haven't GOT it.So consider this Blog an open invitation from Law Journal Newsletters to you. Let's start a dialog. We really DO want to know if you don't like something in one of our newsletters. We really DO want to know what you want more of, or less of, in our pages. We want to know if we are missing something. We want to know if we are overdoing something. Should we cover more or less pharmaceutical news in Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy? Do we have too much or too little Valuation information in The Matrimonial Strategist? Is Internet Law & Strategy filling your needs, or should we get more technical? Should there be more charts in Accounting and Financial Planning for Law firms, or less?Are we helping you keep your eye on all the trends in your practice areas? That's what we are here to do, and despite the fact that we have renowned experts writing and serving on our Boards, that does not mean we have provided everything you need, something we can only judge if we hear from you.So we invited your comments. Write early and often. We promise an answer, and we promise to listen. Don't be a stranger! E-mail: [email protected].
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.