Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Employee Freedom of Choice Act would drastically change the private sector labor relations system that has been in effect since Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act in 1935. Currently, the preferred method that requires an employer to recognize a labor organization as its employees' representative is through a secret ballot election supervised by the National Labor Relations
Board ('NLRB'). Further, prior to any election, an employer generally has a four- to six-week pre-election period to communicate to employees its position as to unionization. Additionally, even if a union prevails in an election, both sides are required to bargain in good faith without necessity of agreement to a proposal or the making of a concession.
For years, unions have complained that the election process is flawed and deprives employees of free choice in the selection of their bargaining representatives. Unions claim that employers unduly delay the scheduling of an election and use the pre-election period to threaten and intimidate employees, causing them to vote against unionization. Unions also argue that permitting an employer to engage in bargaining without direct government oversight frustrates their ability to achieve gains for their members.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.