Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the first U.S. extraditions for an intellectual property crime highlights the growing sophistication and reach of cybercriminals ' and the extensive resources law enforcement must devote to reining in cybercrime.
After fighting his extradition for nearly three years in Australian courts, British national Hew Raymond Griffiths pleaded guilty on April 20 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to one count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. The criminal copyright infringement charge was dismissed. USA v. Griffiths, No. 03-00105 (E.D. Va.).
More Extraditions Coming
'As other countries step up their efforts, and we step up our efforts [to fight cybercrime], you will see more extradition,' says Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Wiechering of the Eastern District of Virginia, who was one of the prosecutors on the case.
The government describes Griffiths as a ringleader of an intricate, global piracy ring called DrinkOrDie that illegally copied and distributed more than $50 million worth of copyrighted computer games, movies, music and software from 1993 to 2001.
Griffiths was extradited from Australia in February. His indictment is based on his criminal activities in Virginia between January 1999 and December 2001 and he faces a five-year maximum sentence and a maximum $250,000 fine.
Griffiths' attorney, Jeffrey Daniel Zimmerman of the Alexandria, VA-based Zimmerman Law Firm, declined to comment before Griffiths' sentencing, which is scheduled for June 22.
Traditionally, extraditions have been for crimes like narcotics trafficking and murder, but as domestic prosecutions of criminal copyright cases increase, it's logical that extraditions would follow, Wiechering says. 'Even five years ago, I don't think you'd see many criminal copyright prosecutions in this country,' he says.
In an earlier case, the Justice Department extradited Ukrainian national Maksym Kovalchuk from Thailand in 2004 for selling pirated software over the Internet. Kovalchuk pleaded guilty in federal court in San Jose, CA, to criminal copyright infringement, trafficking in counterfeit goods and illegal monetary transactions. USA v. Kovalchuk, No. 04-20056 (N.D. Calif.).
Strong domestic enforcement alone is no longer enough to adequately protect intellectual property rights, says lead prosecutor Michael DuBose, who is also deputy chief of the computer crime and intellectual property section at the Department of Justice.
'The digital age has created a virtually borderless world for criminals,' DuBose says. 'It provides a worldwide advertising and distribution channel at their fingertips. Law enforcement's response must be global, and extradition is only one tool.'
So far, industry has led efforts to curtail copyright infringement, through civil suits and by referring information to law enforcement agencies, but the extradition is a sign that law enforcement is stepping up its anti-piracy efforts, said Anthony Pierce, the Washington-based co-head of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's trademark, copyright and Internet litigation committee.
One of the first U.S. extraditions for an intellectual property crime highlights the growing sophistication and reach of cybercriminals ' and the extensive resources law enforcement must devote to reining in cybercrime.
After fighting his extradition for nearly three years in Australian courts, British national Hew Raymond Griffiths pleaded guilty on April 20 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
More Extraditions Coming
'As other countries step up their efforts, and we step up our efforts [to fight cybercrime], you will see more extradition,' says Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Wiechering of the Eastern District of
The government describes Griffiths as a ringleader of an intricate, global piracy ring called DrinkOrDie that illegally copied and distributed more than $50 million worth of copyrighted computer games, movies, music and software from 1993 to 2001.
Griffiths was extradited from Australia in February. His indictment is based on his criminal activities in
Griffiths' attorney, Jeffrey Daniel Zimmerman of the Alexandria, VA-based Zimmerman Law Firm, declined to comment before Griffiths' sentencing, which is scheduled for June 22.
Traditionally, extraditions have been for crimes like narcotics trafficking and murder, but as domestic prosecutions of criminal copyright cases increase, it's logical that extraditions would follow, Wiechering says. 'Even five years ago, I don't think you'd see many criminal copyright prosecutions in this country,' he says.
In an earlier case, the Justice Department extradited Ukrainian national Maksym Kovalchuk from Thailand in 2004 for selling pirated software over the Internet. Kovalchuk pleaded guilty in federal court in San Jose, CA, to criminal copyright infringement, trafficking in counterfeit goods and illegal monetary transactions. USA v. Kovalchuk, No. 04-20056 (N.D. Calif.).
Strong domestic enforcement alone is no longer enough to adequately protect intellectual property rights, says lead prosecutor Michael DuBose, who is also deputy chief of the computer crime and intellectual property section at the Department of Justice.
'The digital age has created a virtually borderless world for criminals,' DuBose says. 'It provides a worldwide advertising and distribution channel at their fingertips. Law enforcement's response must be global, and extradition is only one tool.'
So far, industry has led efforts to curtail copyright infringement, through civil suits and by referring information to law enforcement agencies, but the extradition is a sign that law enforcement is stepping up its anti-piracy efforts, said Anthony Pierce, the Washington-based co-head of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.