Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part Two of a Two-Part Series
Part One of this series discussed security breach notification laws. The conclusion addresses security procedures laws.
In addition to the California security breach notification law, California was the first state to enact a security procedures law (A.B. 1950), which became effective Jan. 1, 2005. This law requires that a business implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect personal information. A few other states, namely 1) Arkansas, 2) Nevada, 3) Rhode Island, and 4) Texas, also have enacted security procedures laws. In addition, Utah has passed such a law, which became effective Jan. 1, 2007. Again, for purposes of the utility of any overview, and because this California law also serves as the model for a number of the other state laws, a step-by-step analysis of this law is also set out here for consideration by landlords and managers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?