Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bingham McCutchen finalized its acquisition of entertainment attorney Marshall Grossman's 40-lawyer L.A. litigation shop, Alschuler Grossman. Grossman, 68, said he agreed to stick around for at least five years in exchange for a compensation package worth at least as much as he'd made at his old firm, which colleagues there said was about $2.5 million. Neither Grossman nor Bingham Chairman Jay Zimmerman would comment on whether other Alschuler partners would be guaranteed salaries.
Grossman said his litigation shop grosses about $40 million; he brings a book of business he estimated at about $15 million. Grossman has been angling to join up with a national firm for more than a year, an ambition that wasn't shared by former name partners Stanton 'Larry' Stein and Robert Kahan. On Jan. 1, they split off, with about 35 lawyers, to form Dreier Stein & Kahan.
Talks between Alschuler Grossman and Bingham got going in November when Grossman and Zimmerman met for lunch at Los Angeles' City Club, along with Alschuler's managing partner, Bruce Friedman, and Bingham's Richard Welch, the managing partner in L.A. There were some pre-existing ties, Welch recalled. Grossman had done litigation work for Riordan & McKinzie, the corporate boutique acquired by Bingham in 2003. Friedman had also helped Riordan with insurance-coverage matters. And Grossman had represented Richard Riordan, the founding partner of Riordan & McKinzie and the former mayor of L.A., who is quoted on the Alschuler home page calling Grossman 'the toughest litigator in Los Angeles.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?