Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Retailer Liable for Customer's Injuries
A retailer is liable for injuries to a customer caused by a pallet in the aisle of a store. King v. PetSmart, No. 416-03429-05, Collin County District Court, 416th, TX, 11-08-2006.
Ronald King, 63, fractured his tibia and fibula, requiring surgery. He was in a PetSmart when he tried to pull a bag of cat litter from a shelf, and his fingers slipped. He took a step back and his foot got lodged between some pallet slats before he fell backward. His lawyer argued that the pallet should not have been there unattended. The defense countered that the pallet did not pose an unreasonable risk of harm. A construction project manager, King was out of work for seven months. The jury found for King, awarding him $300,000.
Subrogation Claim Barred
A subrogation claim will not be heard where a lease waives the landlord's liability and the tenant, as a sophisticated party, negotiated and understood all the terms of the lease. Phoenix Insurance Company v. Town of Vernon et al., HHDX07CV044025148, Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Hartford, Jan. 5, 2007.
The subject premises was a building constructed in the 1800s and had deteriorated in condition. Wiretek, one of 10 tenants of the building, had entered into a five-year lease. On two separate occasions, water pipes linked to the premises' sprinkler system burst outside the Wiretek space and allegedly caused damage to Wiretek's property. Wiretek's insurer paid the damage claim and commenced a subrogation claim against the landlord.
Wiretek's lease provided that the landlord was not liable for any damage or injury to the tenant or to any property of the tenant, no matter how caused. The court held that the landlord was not liable under the subrogation claim. It held that the parties had equal bargaining power and there was no evidence that the parties did not intend to enter into the agreements. It considered that the tenant was aware of the landlord's waiver of liability and had agreed to procure insurance to cover any potential losses.
Retailer Liable for Customer's Injuries
A retailer is liable for injuries to a customer caused by a pallet in the aisle of a store. King v. PetSmart, No. 416-03429-05, Collin County District Court, 416th, TX, 11-08-2006.
Ronald King, 63, fractured his tibia and fibula, requiring surgery. He was in a PetSmart when he tried to pull a bag of cat litter from a shelf, and his fingers slipped. He took a step back and his foot got lodged between some pallet slats before he fell backward. His lawyer argued that the pallet should not have been there unattended. The defense countered that the pallet did not pose an unreasonable risk of harm. A construction project manager, King was out of work for seven months. The jury found for King, awarding him $300,000.
Subrogation Claim Barred
A subrogation claim will not be heard where a lease waives the landlord's liability and the tenant, as a sophisticated party, negotiated and understood all the terms of the lease. Phoenix Insurance Company v. Town of Vernon et al., HHDX07CV044025148, Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Hartford, Jan. 5, 2007.
The subject premises was a building constructed in the 1800s and had deteriorated in condition. Wiretek, one of 10 tenants of the building, had entered into a five-year lease. On two separate occasions, water pipes linked to the premises' sprinkler system burst outside the Wiretek space and allegedly caused damage to Wiretek's property. Wiretek's insurer paid the damage claim and commenced a subrogation claim against the landlord.
Wiretek's lease provided that the landlord was not liable for any damage or injury to the tenant or to any property of the tenant, no matter how caused. The court held that the landlord was not liable under the subrogation claim. It held that the parties had equal bargaining power and there was no evidence that the parties did not intend to enter into the agreements. It considered that the tenant was aware of the landlord's waiver of liability and had agreed to procure insurance to cover any potential losses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.