Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Liability for Measures to Prevent Further Harm

By Michael T. Sharkey
May 31, 2007

General liability policies are frequently ' and incorrectly ' described as covering 'bodily injury' and 'property damage.' More accurately, the policies promise to 'pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of 'bodily injury' or 'property damage' to which this insurance applies.' ISO CG 0001 12 04 (2003) ('CGL'), at 1.

This distinction is significant in many coverage disputes, including questions of coverage for a policyholder's liability for the costs of measures to prevent additional harm from a source that already has caused harm. Insurance companies typically argue that the costs of any type of preventive measures fall outside of coverage, on the grounds that they are directed at the risk of future harm, not existing bodily injury or property damage.

It is a well-settled rule of tort law, however, that compensatory 'damages' for allegedly existing injury include the costs of measures to prevent further injury: 'One who has already suffered injury by the tort of another is entitled to recover for expenditures reasonably made or harm suffered in a reasonable effort to avert further harm.' Restatement (Second) of Torts '919(2) (1979); see also 1 Dan B. Dobbs, Dobbs Law of Remedies '3.9, at 383 (2d ed. 1993).

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?