Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The RED ZONE - Selecting Outside Firms
June 01, 2007
SELECTION in the Red Zone is the fourth and final criterion a law firm team needs to identify when pursuing a client. Just what concerns and experiences will be influencing final selection? The previous three are: HIDDEN DECISION MAKING RELATIONSHIPS AND RETENTION PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS.Just because an in-house counsel recently moved from a competing law firm, do not assume he/she would retain them. Firms should compete in situations in which they might otherwise assume that the competition has an insurmountable advantage. Or if a potential competitor will be sitting in on your meeting, you should elevate the level of candor in your relationship with the buyer by simply asking the buyer how he or she would like you to handle confidential information – invite more substantive discussion. This shows you want to get down to business, talk strategy and not merely promote yourself and your firm. And by doing so you have raised the buyer's expectation that even this meeting will produce value irrespective of which firm is eventually hired. This value is also conducive to closing. It is the decisive moment. Firms attempting to sell their services are well advised to make the most of it.allan colman.
SELECTION in the Red Zone is the fourth and final criterion a law firm team needs to identify when pursuing a client. Just what concerns and experiences will be influencing final selection? The previous three are: HIDDEN DECISION MAKING RELATIONSHIPS AND RETENTION PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS.Just because an in-house counsel recently moved from a competing law firm, do not assume he/she would retain them. Firms should compete in situations in which they might otherwise assume that the competition has an insurmountable advantage. Or if a potential competitor will be sitting in on your meeting, you should elevate the level of candor in your relationship with the buyer by simply asking the buyer how he or she would like you to handle confidential information – invite more substantive discussion. This shows you want to get down to business, talk strategy and not merely promote yourself and your firm. And by doing so you have raised the buyer's expectation that even this meeting will produce value irrespective of which firm is eventually hired. This value is also conducive to closing. It is the decisive moment. Firms attempting to sell their services are well advised to make the most of it.allan colman.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?