Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Just in case the transaction you've just documented using your standard lease forms is not a 'lease,' you've included a granting clause in the form and filed UCC 'notice' filings. So, you've protected the lessor from a re-characterization
risk (i.e., that the transaction is deemed not to create a 'lease' under commercial law) ' right? Well, maybe not.
A recent decision by the Federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin reminds us of the need to draft documents that protect against the possibility that a lease may be re-characterized as a 'sale' to which Article 2 of the UCC applies. In Key Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Pioneer Transportation, Ltd., 472 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (W.D. Wis. 2007), the court found that a transaction documented as a lease was instead a sale of goods with a reservation of a security interest and that Article 2 applied to the transaction. Although the court ultimately rejected the lessee's Article 2 defenses, it did consider them.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.