Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Just in case the transaction you've just documented using your standard lease forms is not a 'lease,' you've included a granting clause in the form and filed UCC 'notice' filings. So, you've protected the lessor from a re-characterization
risk (i.e., that the transaction is deemed not to create a 'lease' under commercial law) ' right? Well, maybe not.
A recent decision by the Federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin reminds us of the need to draft documents that protect against the possibility that a lease may be re-characterized as a 'sale' to which Article 2 of the UCC applies. In Key Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Pioneer Transportation, Ltd., 472 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (W.D. Wis. 2007), the court found that a transaction documented as a lease was instead a sale of goods with a reservation of a security interest and that Article 2 applied to the transaction. Although the court ultimately rejected the lessee's Article 2 defenses, it did consider them.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.