Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We are pleased to announce that Laurence A. Urgenson has accepted the role of Chairman of the Board of Editors of Business Crimes Bulletin beginning with this issue. Urgenson, a partner in the Washington, DC, office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, has been a member of the Board and a regular contributor of articles since this newsletter was founded in 1994. He has long experience in the prosecution and defense of corporations and executives accused of white-collar crime. Prior to joining Kirkland & Ellis in 1994, he served as Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Chief of the Fraud Section, and Executive Director of the Economic Crime Council in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, where he supervised the Fraud Section, General Litigation and Legal Advice Section, and Office of Policy and Management Analysis. Previously, he was Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief of the Criminal Division, and Chief of the Economic Crime Section in the Eastern District of New York. 'I have very much enjoyed my work for the Bulletin,' he says, 'and look forward to continuing to be a part of team in the future.'
We are pleased to announce that Laurence A. Urgenson has accepted the role of Chairman of the Board of Editors of Business Crimes Bulletin beginning with this issue. Urgenson, a partner in the Washington, DC, office of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.