Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There has been a great deal of publicity in the medical community about apology programs ' programs that encourage doctors to affirmatively admit medical mistakes to patients and their families. While there is a lot of support for the idea, there is also a good deal of controversy over whether these programs actually work to reduce litigation and the cost of medical malpractice claims. What, realistically, can apology programs do ' and what can they not do?
How Apology Programs Generally Work
An apology in the medical context has been said to consist of four components: 1) acknowledgment; 2) explanation; 3) expression of remorse; and 4) reparation. Lazare A: Apology in Medical Practice: An Emerging Clinical Skill. JAMA, 2006; 296: 1401-1404. There is a movement afoot to require medical providers to apologize when they make mistakes, especially in light of the knowledge that medical errors occur frequently. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds.: To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2000. Seven states have mandatory notification of adverse events to patients (Nevada, Florida, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Vermont and California). Thirty-four states have varying laws designed to shield expressions of sympathy as proof of liability in court. (Risk Management Consulting accessed at www.sorryworks.net on 7/01/07.) However, no matter the ethical desire to 'do the right thing,' there is little practical information on the litigation consequences of apology. Few institutions have formal systems in place; not only to express the first three components of the medical-setting apology but, more importantly for this article, to adequately compensate patients and their families if a medical mistake has injured them.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.