Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Counsel Concerns
Tortious-Interference Claims. The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey allowed a personal-management company to proceed with tortious-interference claims against the defendants, who are also attorneys. Source Entertainment Group LLC v. Baldonado & Associates P.C., 06-2706 (JBS). Source Enter- tainment had received parental acknowledgment and court approval of a management agreement with minor Tiffany Evans. Source obtained Evans a record deal with Sony Music and agency representation by William Morris. But Evans purportedly became unhappy with Source and entered into an agreement with attorneys Johnathan Sander and Hector Baldonado, Jr., who sent Source a management-agreement termination letter as well as copies of the letter to Source's professional contacts. Sander and Baldonado also became Evans' managers.
Sander and Baldonado argued in part that they were immune from tortious-interference liability because they had been acting as Evans's lawyers, and thus her agents under New Jersey law, when they sent out the termination correspondence. But the district court noted: 'Here, the proposed Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants interfered with Source's contractual relations at a time when Defendants did not have the authority to act on Tiffany's behalf ' Second, Source alleges that Defendants acted in furtherance of their personal gain when Defendants interfered with the Management Contract ' Taking all of the allegations of fact as true and construing them in a light most favorable to Source, as the Court must at this stage in the proceedings, Source's allegations state a claim for tortious interference.'
The district court also found the defendants could not rely on a litigation privilege as attorneys to dismiss a defamation claim by Source based on the letter they had sent to Source's industry contacts. The court emphasized that the letter was 'not intended to achieve the objects of any litigation,' despite the fact that it referred to a motion for instruction Tiffany's guardian ad litem had filed with the state chancery court and which resulted in an order vacating court approval of the Evans/Source management agreement.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?