Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Co-op boards have become accustomed to having their process for approving prospective applicants significantly insulated from review. But boards and applicants must be acutely aware of the effect of the laws protecting the disabled as boards are subject to, and their particular building rules do not trump, the disability laws. It attracted front-page attention in the New York Law Journal (an affiliate publication of this newsletter) on June 20, 2007, when a Manhattan court concluded that a co-op board had exceeded statutory bounds by rescinding approval after learning of a prospective purchaser's disability. In Hirschmann v Hassapoyannes (NYLJ June 25, 2007, p.18, col. 3), it was held that a board may not inquire, directly or indirectly, about an applicant's disability. Nor may a Board punish an applicant by pulling its approval for not disclosing a disability ' even if the board argues that the disclosure of the disability was relevant to them during the board interview.
The Co-op Interview in General
The co-op interview process in New York has generated legendary tales spanning those rejected ' such as celebrities and politicians ' to the process itself, e.g., voluminous application forms and interviews of prospective purchasers' companion animals. To an increasing extent, condominiums engage in similar applicant reviews. For the most part, boards enjoy and exercise wide discretion under the business judgment rule so that their decisions are relatively free from oversight. But boards nonetheless may not violate discrimination laws in either the process or the result.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.