Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Problem solved, right? With a vendor partner now in place to help remove the headaches associated with managing a review database, you should have it made it the shade. Hold on! You're certainly on the right track, but the job doesn't end once the vendor is chosen. There are still a number of technical items that need to be considered about this review environment before you can turn your entire review team loose on the data. An engineering assessment of the review environment itself will go a long way in helping identify potential problems and risks early on as well as becoming the first step toward a successful overall review. Following is a short checklist that can aid in this assessment process:
1. Who is the ISP?
The may seem pretty simple and straightforward, but it cannot be overlooked. Reliability, network speed and throughput can have a tremendous impact on a review project. Talk to your IT network gurus to find out who your ISP is and how reliable are they. Are they a well-established company, or are they a newer, cheaper outfit that may not have an established track record? Or, does your firm or company have multiple service providers? Multiple providers can help ensure redundancy such that if one fails, the IT network people should be able to get your team back online very quickly. This is an especially important consideration if the review requires setting up an off-site 'war room.' There are many service providers who offer review facilities with Internet access, workstations, etc., that are specifically designed for off-site reviews.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?