Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York awarded attorney fees and costs to the defense in a suit that alleged the song 'Stand Up' by hip-hop artists Ludacris and Kanye West infringed the plaintiff's composition 'Straight Like That.' BMS Entertainment/Heat Music LLC v. Bridges, 04 Civ. 2584 (PKC). A jury found in favor of the defendants. In its attorney-fees ruling, the district court noted that the failure of plaintiffs' counsel to comply with court orders during the litigation 'was not a fleeting episode ' Moreover, the unwillingness of the plaintiff's expert to comply with requests from [plaintiffs' counsel Ernest] Savoy was, in substantial part, due to non-payment of the experts' fees, which may be fairly laid at the feet of the plaintiffs.'
In the Second Circuit, within which the Southern District resides, a 'presumptively reasonable fee' includes 'the reasonable hourly rate that a paying client would be willing to pay, taking all case specific variable[s] into account.' The Manhattan federal district court accepted that because 'Stand Up' was a major hit, it 'was, therefore, reasonable for the Bridges Defendants to hire experienced copyright counsel.'
The court then awarded attorney fees of $110,927 for work by Bridges' lawyers, Christine Lepera and Justin Kattan of the New York office of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal. Under Sec. 505 of the Copyright Act, which provides for attorney fees and costs for prevailing parties, the court awarded co-defendants Universal Music Group $165,978 for legal work by Andrew Bart of the New York office of Jenner & Block and his associates.
Copyright Infringement. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
In the Second Circuit, within which the Southern District resides, a 'presumptively reasonable fee' includes 'the reasonable hourly rate that a paying client would be willing to pay, taking all case specific variable[s] into account.' The Manhattan federal district court accepted that because 'Stand Up' was a major hit, it 'was, therefore, reasonable for the Bridges Defendants to hire experienced copyright counsel.'
The court then awarded attorney fees of $110,927 for work by Bridges' lawyers, Christine Lepera and Justin Kattan of the
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.