Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Clause & Effect
Recording Agreements/Forum-Selection Clause. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that an artist's breach-of-contract claim against a record company was subject to a forum-selection clause, but his copyright-infringement claim against the company wasn't. Phillips v. Active Audio Ltd., 05-7017-CV. The recording agreement that hip-hop artist Pete Rock entered into with the label Barely Breaking Even (BBE) stated that 'validity[,] construction[,] and effect of this agreement and any or all modifications hereof shall be governed by English Law and any legal proceedings that may arise out of it are to be brought in England.' Rock later filed suit in Manhattan federal district court for breach of contract for BBE's alleged failure to pay the second half of a royalty advance and for copyright infringement for releasing an album of his songs without his permission.
The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the forum-selection clause was mandatory, noting: 'The parties' use of the phrase 'are to be brought' establishes England as an obligatory venue for proceedings within the scope of the clause.' The appeals court then found: 'The contract claim for money owed and due falls squarely under the forum selection clause: the contract establishes [Rocks'] right to receive, and BBE's duty to pay, the installment and sets forth the relevant conditions.' But the appeals court added that Rock 'does not rely on the recording contract to establish his ownership of the relevant copyrights, but on his authorship of the work ' Plaintiff asserts, not implausibly ' there is no suggestion of bad faith on his part ' that he has been the rightful owner of the copyrights from the moment the songs became entitled to copyright protection ' Indeed, if [he] were to succeed in persuading the trial court of his interpretation of the recording contract, success on the merits of his copyright claims would leave the recording contract undisturbed.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.