Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Clause & Effect

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 28, 2007

Recording Agreements/Forum-Selection Clause. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that an artist's breach-of-contract claim against a record company was subject to a forum-selection clause, but his copyright-infringement claim against the company wasn't. Phillips v. Active Audio Ltd., 05-7017-CV. The recording agreement that hip-hop artist Pete Rock entered into with the label Barely Breaking Even (BBE) stated that 'validity[,] construction[,] and effect of this agreement and any or all modifications hereof shall be governed by English Law and any legal proceedings that may arise out of it are to be brought in England.' Rock later filed suit in Manhattan federal district court for breach of contract for BBE's alleged failure to pay the second half of a royalty advance and for copyright infringement for releasing an album of his songs without his permission.

The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the forum-selection clause was mandatory, noting: 'The parties' use of the phrase 'are to be brought' establishes England as an obligatory venue for proceedings within the scope of the clause.' The appeals court then found: 'The contract claim for money owed and due falls squarely under the forum selection clause: the contract establishes [Rocks'] right to receive, and BBE's duty to pay, the installment and sets forth the relevant conditions.' But the appeals court added that Rock 'does not rely on the recording contract to establish his ownership of the relevant copyrights, but on his authorship of the work ' Plaintiff asserts, not implausibly ' there is no suggestion of bad faith on his part ' that he has been the rightful owner of the copyrights from the moment the songs became entitled to copyright protection ' Indeed, if [he] were to succeed in persuading the trial court of his interpretation of the recording contract, success on the merits of his copyright claims would leave the recording contract undisturbed.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.