Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Employment-Based Visa Indecision

By Rebecca L. Sigmund
August 28, 2007

The government giveth and the government taketh away. Two weeks after announcing that most of the employment-based immigrant visa categories would be current on July 1, 2007, the Department of State ('DOS') reversed its announcement by stating that effective July 2, no visa numbers were available for employment-based immigrant visa categories, and further, would not become available until Oct. 1, 2007 (under fiscal year 2008 numbers). When the DOS announced that all categories would be available come July 1, there was an immediate response by applicants who had been waiting years for their 'priority date' to become current so that they could complete the last and long-awaited step of their permanent residency cases. Relying on the DOS announcement, thousands of applicants, their employers and attorneys spent substantial time, expense and effort to ensure July submissions.

The subsequent withdrawal of the visa numbers was startling and unprecedented, and, once again, placed these applicants in a state of uncertainty and further delay.

Some Background

Historically, the U.S. government makes approximately 700,000 immigrant visa numbers available each year for those wanting to obtain permanent residency (i.e., their 'green card'). A maximum 25,620 of these visa numbers are allocated to any one independent country in a given year, while a maximum 7320 visa numbers can be allocated to any one colony of an independent country in a given year.

Before applying for a green card, prospective permanent residents must qualify for one of the family-based or employment-based preference categories, and a visa number must be available in one of those categories. Visa numbers are granted on a first-come, first-served basis. If, in any year, the number of people qualifying for a particular preference category exceeds the number of visa numbers allocated to that preference, those for whom visa numbers are not available are placed on a waiting list. They must wait until additional visa numbers are allocated to their preference category before they can complete the process.

Preference Categories

There are five preference categories available for employment-based immigrants, with a total of 140,000 visas allocated across these five categories. The first and/or second steps of the process may be filed with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ('USCIS'), and will establish a person's 'priority date.' However, the last step cannot be completed until the person's priority date is current.

Thus, the withdrawal frustrated those affected by the government's recent announcement regarding the availability of visa numbers. These applicants not only possessed skills deemed to be in short supply in the U.S., making them desirable additions to the workforce, they also followed the letter of the law in their pursuit of permanent residency through a lengthy and often burdensome process ' and yet they were sent back into limbo when they thought the end was near.

Class Actions

In response to the recent announcement, the American Immigration Lawyers Foundation prepared two class actions, covering: 1) those who filed their applications by July 2; and 2) those who were dissuaded from filing due to the July 2 announcement. Additional pressure ensued from legislators, employers, related organizations and foreign professionals as to the legality, basic fairness and the audacity of the government's actions.

The pressure proved successful, and on July 17, the government once again reversed its decision, announcing that all skilled worker categories would be current for July, and further, that they would remain current until Aug. 17 in order to make up for the lost month. All's well that ends well? Not likely. Backlogs will most likely ensue at the USCIS level with applicants' cases pending for varying lengths of time.

This government debacle is but one example of the broken immigration system in place and why we need positive immigration reform.


Rebecca L. Sigmund is a partner at Powell Goldstein LLP (Atlanta) and manages the firm's Immigration Practice Group. She can be reached at [email protected] or 404-572-6893.

The government giveth and the government taketh away. Two weeks after announcing that most of the employment-based immigrant visa categories would be current on July 1, 2007, the Department of State ('DOS') reversed its announcement by stating that effective July 2, no visa numbers were available for employment-based immigrant visa categories, and further, would not become available until Oct. 1, 2007 (under fiscal year 2008 numbers). When the DOS announced that all categories would be available come July 1, there was an immediate response by applicants who had been waiting years for their 'priority date' to become current so that they could complete the last and long-awaited step of their permanent residency cases. Relying on the DOS announcement, thousands of applicants, their employers and attorneys spent substantial time, expense and effort to ensure July submissions.

The subsequent withdrawal of the visa numbers was startling and unprecedented, and, once again, placed these applicants in a state of uncertainty and further delay.

Some Background

Historically, the U.S. government makes approximately 700,000 immigrant visa numbers available each year for those wanting to obtain permanent residency (i.e., their 'green card'). A maximum 25,620 of these visa numbers are allocated to any one independent country in a given year, while a maximum 7320 visa numbers can be allocated to any one colony of an independent country in a given year.

Before applying for a green card, prospective permanent residents must qualify for one of the family-based or employment-based preference categories, and a visa number must be available in one of those categories. Visa numbers are granted on a first-come, first-served basis. If, in any year, the number of people qualifying for a particular preference category exceeds the number of visa numbers allocated to that preference, those for whom visa numbers are not available are placed on a waiting list. They must wait until additional visa numbers are allocated to their preference category before they can complete the process.

Preference Categories

There are five preference categories available for employment-based immigrants, with a total of 140,000 visas allocated across these five categories. The first and/or second steps of the process may be filed with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ('USCIS'), and will establish a person's 'priority date.' However, the last step cannot be completed until the person's priority date is current.

Thus, the withdrawal frustrated those affected by the government's recent announcement regarding the availability of visa numbers. These applicants not only possessed skills deemed to be in short supply in the U.S., making them desirable additions to the workforce, they also followed the letter of the law in their pursuit of permanent residency through a lengthy and often burdensome process ' and yet they were sent back into limbo when they thought the end was near.

Class Actions

In response to the recent announcement, the American Immigration Lawyers Foundation prepared two class actions, covering: 1) those who filed their applications by July 2; and 2) those who were dissuaded from filing due to the July 2 announcement. Additional pressure ensued from legislators, employers, related organizations and foreign professionals as to the legality, basic fairness and the audacity of the government's actions.

The pressure proved successful, and on July 17, the government once again reversed its decision, announcing that all skilled worker categories would be current for July, and further, that they would remain current until Aug. 17 in order to make up for the lost month. All's well that ends well? Not likely. Backlogs will most likely ensue at the USCIS level with applicants' cases pending for varying lengths of time.

This government debacle is but one example of the broken immigration system in place and why we need positive immigration reform.


Rebecca L. Sigmund is a partner at Powell Goldstein LLP (Atlanta) and manages the firm's Immigration Practice Group. She can be reached at [email protected] or 404-572-6893.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.