Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Federal Contractors and Executive Order 11246

By Sherrard Lee Hayes and Shafeeqa Giarratani
August 28, 2007

This past year has seen a flurry of activity under Executive Order 11246 ('EO 11246'), the law that governs the administration of affirmative action programs of employers that have certain government contracts or subcontracts. EO 11246 provides the government a way of evaluating employment-related race and gender trends for a particular employer. Based on the data provided by the employer, the government could, for instance, conclude that hiring decisions resulted in predicted outcomes with respect to racial and gender composition.

On the other hand, the data could indicate to the government that a significant shortfall exists in the hiring of a particular race or gender, and that the shortfall cannot be explained merely by chance. Such a case could result in significant financial and equitable remedies that go beyond simply paying a fine. Thus, the manner in which the underlying employment data are gathered and reported is critical and directly related to what conclusions the government reaches about a company's hiring, promotion, and discharge practices.

In the wake of these new changes, this article offers suggestions of best practices relating to one of the most noteworthy developments for EO 11246 compliance: the 'Internet Applicant' rule, which became effective on Feb. 6, 2006. This rule impacts, among other things, how a covered employer calculates applicants for purposes of creating the data that are submitted to the government. Although the new rule has been effective since last year, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs ('OFCCP'), which enforces the rule, has emphasized that applicant tracking and record retention issues will be a focus of OFCCP compliance efforts in 2007 audits. The significance of this new rule is widespread, but in general may dramatically affect how covered employers who use the Internet (or 'related data technologies') to obtain resumes or applications have to account for the process, and may significantly alter an employer's statistical employment-related data. To ensure compliance, covered employers should understand the nuances of the rule and undertake compliance efforts, if they have not already.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?