Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The story may be a familiar one. Your company makes a product that it sells it through various retailers or distributors. Over the years, you've worked hard to maintain the product's premium image, encouraged vigorous marketing and customer service by resellers, and maintained the peace between competing retail outlets. Your 'suggested retail price' has served everyone well, and no one has yet broken ranks.
But now one of your oldest retailers has decided to open up an Internet storefront and is selling your premium brand online at just pennies above wholesale. These sales are faceless, without any explanation of your product and with no customer service. Even worse, the Web site pictures your product alongside cheap knock-offs that could never be considered premium brands. It's only been a month and you've fielded dozens of angry calls from other retailers who are losing business, urging you to fix the problem.
You call the retailer and try to convince him to stop, pleading with him to take the larger margins from your suggested minimum price. When he still refuses, you tell him you plan to cease dealing with him unless he shapes up. At that point, he relents and agrees to adhere to the suggested price.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?