Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cooperatives & Condominiums

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 29, 2007

Seller's Failure to Deliver Statement from Condo Board Constitutes Breach Of Contract

Lisenenkov v. Kaszirer

NYLJ 6/25/07, p. 34, col. 2

AppDiv, First Dept

(memorandum opinion)

In condominium purchaser's action against seller for return of a down payment, seller appealed from Supreme Court's award of summary judgment to purchaser. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that seller's failure to deliver to purchaser statements from the condominium board asserting that all common charges were current constituted breach of the sale contract and entitled purchaser to return of the down payment.

The sale contract provided that seller would deliver title subject to exceptions as the title insurer was willing 'without special or additional premium, to omit as exceptions to coverage.' The title report included two exceptions ' one was for seller's failure to deliver a waiver of a right of first refusal from the condominium, and the second was seller's failure to deliver a statement that common charges were current to the date of the closing. Because the title insurer was not willing to omit these exceptions, purchaser's lender refused to issue the required checks at closing. Purchaser then brought this action for return of the down payment.

In affirming Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to purchaser, the Appellate Division noted that the condominium board had refused to give seller either of the documents because the board was concerned about purchaser's financial ability to pay common charges. As a result, the board indicated that it would not provide the documents unless purchaser paid two years of common charges in advance. The court noted, however, that the condominium board had no legal right to reject the buyer. Moreover, the board had no right to demand, and the purchaser had no obligation to pay, advance common charges. Because the sale contract required seller to deliver the required documents from the condominium board, seller's failure to deliver those documents rendered title uninsurable, and constituted a default by the seller. As a result, buyer was entitled to return of the down payment.

Seller's Failure to Deliver Statement from Condo Board Constitutes Breach Of Contract

Lisenenkov v. Kaszirer

NYLJ 6/25/07, p. 34, col. 2

AppDiv, First Dept

(memorandum opinion)

In condominium purchaser's action against seller for return of a down payment, seller appealed from Supreme Court's award of summary judgment to purchaser. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that seller's failure to deliver to purchaser statements from the condominium board asserting that all common charges were current constituted breach of the sale contract and entitled purchaser to return of the down payment.

The sale contract provided that seller would deliver title subject to exceptions as the title insurer was willing 'without special or additional premium, to omit as exceptions to coverage.' The title report included two exceptions ' one was for seller's failure to deliver a waiver of a right of first refusal from the condominium, and the second was seller's failure to deliver a statement that common charges were current to the date of the closing. Because the title insurer was not willing to omit these exceptions, purchaser's lender refused to issue the required checks at closing. Purchaser then brought this action for return of the down payment.

In affirming Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to purchaser, the Appellate Division noted that the condominium board had refused to give seller either of the documents because the board was concerned about purchaser's financial ability to pay common charges. As a result, the board indicated that it would not provide the documents unless purchaser paid two years of common charges in advance. The court noted, however, that the condominium board had no legal right to reject the buyer. Moreover, the board had no right to demand, and the purchaser had no obligation to pay, advance common charges. Because the sale contract required seller to deliver the required documents from the condominium board, seller's failure to deliver those documents rendered title uninsurable, and constituted a default by the seller. As a result, buyer was entitled to return of the down payment.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.